|
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals sent a case pitting a Washington, D.C.-based defense contractor against Nanjemoy residents back to the county Board of Appeals because the board violated due process protections and the state Open Meetings Act, according to an opinion the court filed Friday.
The opinion, penned by Judge Robert A. Zarnoch, states that the Board of Appeals violated constitutional guarantees of due process and the Open Meetings Act by “conducting a meeting closed to some members of the public at which the merits of the case were discussed, not made a part of the record, but nevertheless relied upon by the Board.”
[...]
Zarnoch also wrote that the board violated the constitutional due process rights of people opposing the project by relying on the site visit for approval without written testimony from the site visit that opponents could challenge through cross-examination and other means.
As a result, the case will now go back to the Board of Appeals for a new public hearing and decision, after WSG requests a new hearing.
The case will technically be remanded to the Charles County Circuit Court before it gets remanded back to the Board of Appeals.
[...]
Mark Mudd, an attorney with Mudd, Mudd & Fitzgerald in La Plata who represents WSG, said he was disappointed in the decision.
“Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while,” Mudd said.
Mudd said he needed to review the opinion thoroughly before making a decision to move forward with a new hearing before the Board of Appeals.
County government spokeswoman Crystal Hunt said that the response from the county and county attorney’s office is that “the matter is between the parties involved and the county is not arguing the merits of case.”
Guess who the blind squirrel is?
Ich bin ein Blind Squirrel
"We believe we’ve done all we are allowed to do under the law and the rules and procedures, which the Court requires us to follow. We will await the decision of the Court and, in the meantime, we will be examining procedural rules for all of the County’s appointed boards and commissions, in conjunction with the Office of the County Attorney."
Next entry: Commissioners again defeat reporting rule for donations
Previous entry: Bell tolls for the U.S. Mail, as we know it