Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Register

-ADVERTISMENT-
Slideshow image
-ADVERTISMENT-
Anyone interested in ad space, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Search Delusional Duck Recent Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post comments.

On 05/22/12 at 02:11 PM:
seahorse added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 09:01 AM:
xcitor added comments to the thread: Appeals court rejects ballot access petitions for Libertarians, Greens
On 05/22/12 at 06:17 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: STAFF REPORTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MAY 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 10:06 PM:
Iamangttia added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 06:04 PM:
MarylandRes added comments to the thread: Tax abuse
On 05/21/12 at 06:01 PM:
MarylandRes added comments to the thread: Tax abuse
On 05/21/12 at 11:26 AM:
Hydrilla added comments to the thread: Hoyer Statement on FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act
On 05/21/12 at 11:21 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Commissioner Approval Items
On 05/21/12 at 11:19 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 11:17 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Commissioner Approval Items
On 05/21/12 at 11:12 AM:
Diane Edge, (AKA gizmo123) added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/21/12 at 11:12 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: St. Charles Kicks Off Summer Concert Series
On 05/21/12 at 11:09 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 08:21 AM:
franklin added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/21/12 at 07:52 AM:
xcitor added comments to the thread: Hoyer Statement on FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act
On 05/21/12 at 07:09 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/20/12 at 02:28 PM:
jdman1 added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/19/12 at 07:55 PM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: State’s attorney pleads for more lawyers
On 05/19/12 at 02:09 PM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Indian Head development board seeks new blood
On 05/18/12 at 06:18 PM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Charles County Update: Anti-Poverty Summit
Recent Forum Posts
All registered members can start new threads and/or reply to existing ones on the Discussion Forums.
  • 12/21/2012
    last comment by: Viper
    01/26/2012 at 05:06 pm
Other Local Blogs
Ready, Willing and Abell

St. Charles Forums (ACPT)

Charles County Links Other Links Cable News Networks Local Media Newspapers Archives Blog Stats
Registered members: 637
Number of posts: 40126
Number of Comments: 46629
Last: 05/22/2012 02:11 pm
Guests online: 29


Members logged on:
Delusional Duck Feeds Credits
Powered by ExpressionEngine from EllisLab, Inc.
Hosting by EngineHosting

image

5041155

Add your comments


This page has been viewed 127 times

Court upholds tracking suspects with GPS

Washington Post,

A convicted sex offender being tracked as a suspect in a string of sexual assaults, did not have his rights violated when Fairfax police secretly placed a global positioning system (GPS) device on his vehicle without a warrant, the Virginia Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.

After 11 attacks on women in eastern Fairfax County in 2008, many in the Falls Church area, detectives zeroed in on David L. Foltz because he lived in the area and was previously convicted of rape. He had served 17 years in prison and was released in 2007.

Detectives placed a GPS device inside the bumper of a van he used for work, which was parked on the street in front of his house. The device later showed that Foltz had been near one of the attacks.


Posted by: Sammy on 09/07/10 at 06:14 PM
    Page 1 of 1 pages
  • 1. · i've been following this case, and to me the logic/argument made here is valid and makes sense.

    if the police are allowed to track someone on foot, by car, etc. 24/7 without a warrant, then it follows that utilizing technology that does the same a human can is OK without a warrant.

    of course turnabout is fair play, and this same logic allows one to follow/track/tail a police officer 24/7 and not be breaking any laws, if that's what one wants to do.

    it's already been made clear that we don't really own our cell phone data. the carriers do. we are their customers, nothing more. there is no fiduciary responsibility to act in our best interests.

    Comment by xcitor  on  09/07/10  at  07:39 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 2. · "of course turnabout is fair play, and this same logic allows one to follow/track/tail a police officer 24/7 and not be breaking any laws, if that's what one wants to do."

    But why would you?

    Comment by Maria  on  09/08/10  at  08:16 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 3. · i certainly wouldn't. i have better things to do with my time.

    it is important to point out that the logic works both ways.

    or if you prefer the snark you've come to expect from me...

    public photography of pretty much any building (save for military installations and nuclear facilities) is not illegal, yet some ill-informed police are arresting people for committing no crime at all.

    why would they do that?

    because they can.

    Comment by xcitor  on  09/08/10  at  09:00 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 4. · Touche'

    Comment by Maria  on  09/08/10  at  09:18 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • Page 1 of 1 pages

YOU MUST BE A REGISTERED MEMBER AND LOGGED-IN TO POST COMMENTS

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

<< Back to main

Copyright © 2003-2012, Delusional Duck®, All rights reserved. Delusional Duck® is a Registered Trademark.
Comment Policy | Terms of Use | .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Home | Discussion Forums