Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Register

-ADVERTISMENT-
Slideshow image
-ADVERTISMENT-
Anyone interested in ad space, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Search Delusional Duck Recent Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post comments.

On 05/22/12 at 03:30 PM:
seahorse added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 03:00 PM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 02:11 PM:
seahorse added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 09:01 AM:
xcitor added comments to the thread: Appeals court rejects ballot access petitions for Libertarians, Greens
On 05/22/12 at 06:17 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: STAFF REPORTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MAY 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 10:06 PM:
Iamangttia added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 06:04 PM:
MarylandRes added comments to the thread: Tax abuse
On 05/21/12 at 06:01 PM:
MarylandRes added comments to the thread: Tax abuse
On 05/21/12 at 11:26 AM:
Hydrilla added comments to the thread: Hoyer Statement on FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act
On 05/21/12 at 11:21 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Commissioner Approval Items
On 05/21/12 at 11:19 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 11:17 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Commissioner Approval Items
On 05/21/12 at 11:12 AM:
Diane Edge, (AKA gizmo123) added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/21/12 at 11:12 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: St. Charles Kicks Off Summer Concert Series
On 05/21/12 at 11:09 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 08:21 AM:
franklin added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/21/12 at 07:52 AM:
xcitor added comments to the thread: Hoyer Statement on FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act
On 05/21/12 at 07:09 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/20/12 at 02:28 PM:
jdman1 added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/19/12 at 07:55 PM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: State’s attorney pleads for more lawyers
Recent Forum Posts
All registered members can start new threads and/or reply to existing ones on the Discussion Forums.
  • 12/21/2012
    last comment by: Viper
    01/26/2012 at 05:06 pm
Other Local Blogs
Ready, Willing and Abell

St. Charles Forums (ACPT)

Charles County Links Other Links Cable News Networks Local Media Newspapers Archives Blog Stats
Registered members: 637
Number of posts: 40132
Number of Comments: 46631
Last: 05/22/2012 03:30 pm
Guests online: 35


Members logged on:
Delusional Duck Feeds Credits
Powered by ExpressionEngine from EllisLab, Inc.
Hosting by EngineHosting

image

5041396

Add your comments


This page has been viewed 554 times

From the Duck Hotline: Report on the October 1 Meeting of the Reconstituted WRAC

Charles County Groundwater Update - Report on the October 1 Meeting of the Reconstituted WRAC (Water Resources Advisory Committee)

IMPORTANT NOTE: Maryland Geological Survey staff will brief the WRAC Committee on the status of the aquifers serving the County at its next meeting, and I recommend that those receiving this report consider attending.  Details appear at the bottom of this report.

While a number of staff people from the County were there along with someone from LaPlata, the Indian Head base, and MDE, citizens-at-large were underrepresented at the October 1 meeting of WRAC.  Elmer Biles (representing small private water companies) and Larry Wooster (representing well drillers) were the only citizen member representatives there.  The individual well owner representative was absent, and the public water system spot from the County’s ‘urban” areas remains unfilled. 

Jason Groth convened the meeting shortly after 10:10.  a.m.  The bulk of the meeting, which lasted until nearly noon (these customarily end at 11:30) was devoted to the issue of back-up generators at County-owned wells.  After much back and forth, the committee agreed to recommend that the County Utilities department develop a capital improvement project request for fiscal year 2011 (starting 07/10) to #1 install connections for portable generators at some (undetermined) number of wells, #2 purchase one additional backup portable generator (it now has one), and #3 install permanent backup generators at some (undetermined) number of wells (6 of the County’s wells currently have such generators). 

Additionally, the committee appeared poised to recommend that Charles County join the recently developed “Maryland Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement for Intrastate Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network” or “WARN.” This was explained as a mechanism to facilitate sharing of personnel and equipment in the event of emergencies, much like that already in place in the electric power industry.  Various staff members on the committee as well as the MDE representative in attendance said that joining the WARN system would do much to address the backup generator issue.  It was also noted that MDE does require backup generators for pumping stations in order to avoid sewage spills, but does not require backup generators at wells.

The issue of the County’s response to the DNR decision to refuse to transfer the Chapman State Park wells and the land they are on to the County got virtually no attention.  At the very end of the meeting Jason announced that the County had sent a letter of protest to the Governor.  No copies were available and when asked he said that is was a public document but “highly sensitive” and that a FOIA request might need to be made.  (Note: this is the first time I ever recall a water-related document being withheld in this fashion.  While I have not seen this letter, I understand that 1) the County claims that the State made a commitment to transfer the wells to the County and 2) the County says that if the State refuses to transfer the wells, the State should give the County $960,000 to drill new ones.  If anyone has a copy of this letter or additional information about what it contains, it would be good to share that around.)

Another important topic which got virtually no attention is the fact that the Maryland Geological Survey’s 2009 report on ground-water levels in the MGS observation wells in Charles County was made available to everyone attending the meeting.  The report shows two important things:

First, the County’s efforts to relieve pressure on the Lower Patapsco aquifer in the north and northwest parts of the County have been successful —“Increasing water levels in the Lower Patapsco aquifer were observed for the second consecutive year in wells in the far north and northwestern parts of the county…”  These efforts (including one by Indian Head prompted by MDE) include the following:
#1.  The recent shift by the County to the Patuxent aquifer for most parts of Bryans Road
#2.  The fact that Indian Head is drilling (or has drilled) a well into the Patuxent, and plans on shifting much of its water use to that aquifer, something that will help ease pressure on the Lower Patapsco in western Charles County.
#3.  The fact that Strawberry Hills pipegrid interconnet has been authorized, something that will further ease the pressure on the Lower Patapsco in the NW corner of the county (and the Moyaone).
#4.  Use of WSSC water on the western side of Waldorf further relieves pressure on the Lower Patapsco.  This is also helpful to NW Charles County (and the Moyaone).

Second, at the same time, “In all regions of the Patuxent aquifer, water levels continue to decline, with slightly decelerating declines in wells of the Bryans Road area….”  Whether this is because of the shift to the Patuxent as noted in points 1-3 above was not discussed.  However, MGS representatives will come to the next WRAC meeting Thursday morning Nov. 5 at 10 a.m. to give a thorough briefing, and this is one point which is certain to be explored. 

These WRAC meetings are open to the public.  I recommend that interested people make every attempt to come to this next meeting, since it will be an unusually good opportunity to get the best factual information available about the groundwater situation in Charles County.  It will be in the County Administration Building in LaPLata.  Ask for directions when you sign in.


Posted by: Sammy on 10/04/09 at 07:15 AM
    Page 1 of 1 pages
  • 1. · “In ALL regions of the Patuxent aquifer, water levels continue to decline, with slightly decelerating declines in wells of the Bryans Road area….”

    This is particularly disturbing, as the Patuxent is the LAST aquifer before bedrock.

    Bryans Road and Indian Head are already tapped into it, as are the two Chapman's wells that the Commissioners are trying to obtain from the State.

    If the Patuxent continues this decline, it could leave many sections of the County "without a drop to drink" in the future.

    Comment by cheryl  on  10/04/09  at  08:17 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 2. ·
    If the Patuxent continues this decline, it could leave many sections of the County "without a drop to drink" in the future.

    But, Cheryl...Commissioner President Cooper said there is no longer a water crisis in Charles County. He wished it, he said it, so, it must be true! (Extremely HEAVY sarcasm)

    formerly known on the ‘Duck as CCCitizen and, unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed are those of my own.

    Comment by Pauleen Brewer  on  10/04/09  at  08:25 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 3. · "At the very end of the meeting Jason announced that the County had sent a letter of protest to the Governor. No copies were available and when asked he said that is was a public document but “highly sensitive” and that a FOIA request might need to be made."

    This speaks volumes on how the Commissioners are conducting business. A FOIA request for a letter about water???? It certainly peaks one’s curiosity to see what is contained in the letter and will likely result in several FOIA requests. Of course, that is a time consuming process and no doubt that is what the powers that be are counting on.

    Comment by Ken Robinson  on  10/04/09  at  08:33 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 4. ·
    He wished it, he said it, so, it must be true!

    Remember this little ditty?

    Charles County Board of Commissioners President F. Wayne Cooper mis-represented, to The Bay Net, the Board’s interaction with Maryland’s Public Services Commission regarding the Mirant Mid-Atlantic Morgantown power generating station expansion project.


    formerly known on the ‘Duck as CCCitizen and, unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed are those of my own.

    Comment by Pauleen Brewer  on  10/04/09  at  08:38 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 5. · One very positive bit of information came from the WRAC meeting. The MDE representative in attendance indicated that the state will be changing its policy this month that will allow treated effluent to be used for watering golf courses and other landscaping applications. This could go a long way towards relieving some pressure on the aquifers.

    I know I will be applying pressure to put this into action at several locations in the county once it is legal.

    Comment by Ken Robinson  on  10/04/09  at  08:48 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 6. · As long as we’re bringing up old news, remember that the one “victory” we achieved in our opposition to Mirant’s Morgantown expansion plans a couple of years ago was that the Public Service Commission required the company to find an alternative to groundwater for cooling the scrubbers.

    The preferred option by Mirant at the time was to use treated effluent from La Plata which would have had the additional positive impact of diverting grey water from the Port Tobacco River to the plant. The county blew that deal resulting in Mirant constructing a desalinization (reverse osmosis) plant.

    Though this is also very good news, the first option which was touted in the media at the time by John Reardon, former Director of Economic Development for the county, would have had enormous positive environmental implications.

    See: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/18/AR2007081801128.html

    Comment by Ken Robinson  on  10/04/09  at  09:06 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 7. ·
    At the very end of the meeting Jason announced that the County had sent a letter of protest to the Governor. No copies were available and when asked he said that is was a public document but “highly sensitive”


    Most can probably give a good guess on this one. Wasn't it about 3 weeks ago that MurrayMac&Sally; plus the Un-Fab 5 went trooping up to visit O'Malley? And wasn't it about 3 weeks ago that DNR told the county NO to a transfer of water wells? So a letter of protest would be targeting DNR's decision for holding firm by not letting the commissioners suck more water out of an already depleted aquifer thereby endangering western county residents who are already having to drill deeper for potable drinking water.

    But wait there's more to this guesstimate. That Bryan Road's area growth plan and the tech park; to develop these areas into what the commissioners are aiming for, wouldn't a guaranteed water supply be the first item of necessity?

    I would bet that letter is "highly sensitive" and would be a really juicy read especially as elections draw closer.

    Comment by seahorse  on  10/04/09  at  09:22 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 8. · #2 - But of course!! I should've know better!!!!

    #7 - Not only the Bryans Road area, but the development along the CCC extension would obtain water from the aquifers too!!

    I believe the idea behind using the Chapman's wells was to allow the Lower Patapsco to rebound, but ironically, by using the Chapman's wells, it would encourage more "growth", which over time, would only exacerbate the water supply problem.

    #3 - Looks to me as though there's something about this issue that the Commissioners don't want the public to know about... could it be that the "plans" for development in the Bryans Road/Indian Head area may be in jeopardy unless they're able to acquire that much needed resource from the Chapman's wells???

    #6 - thanks Ken for all your efforts re: Mirant!!!!!

    Comment by cheryl  on  10/04/09  at  09:50 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 9. ·
    #1. The recent shift by the County to the Patuxent aquifer for most parts of Bryans Road
    #2. The fact that Indian Head is drilling (or has drilled) a well into the Patuxent, and plans on shifting much of its water use to that aquifer, something that will help ease pressure on the Lower Patapsco in western Charles County.

    “In all regions of the Patuxent aquifer, water levels continue to decline, with slightly decelerating declines in wells of the Bryans Road area….” Whether this is because of the shift to the Patuxent as noted in points 1-3 above was not discussed.


    This sounds like robbing Peter to pay Paul!

    Comment by seahorse  on  10/04/09  at  10:03 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 10. · #6, Ken The county blew that deal

    I read the article and that deal should've been given top priority. It was a definite win-win any way you look at it. It just goes to show how ineffective our commissioners are.

    2010

    Comment by seahorse  on  10/04/09  at  10:41 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 11. · The Indian Head Science and Tech Park will cause Charles County to incur $1,537,934 per year in water and sewer charges to support the construction and service for this project.

    (Table 6, page 15, Prepared by Urban Analytics, Inc.) presented to the County Commissioners for the Applicant and submitted with the application by the Planning Commission.

    The proposal was for the County to pay on the annual debt in several ways, one of which was to use bond yield payments at various rates.

    For instance, a 4.00% interest rate over full build out years (15) at full occupancy rate for this project will cost us (tax payers) approximately $17.1 million dollars for water and sewer.

    Now that’s something they didn't tell anyone in the hearings or the flyers they handed out.

    Also, all the projections for profit and revenue were at full occupancy and as we have all been reading lately; retail space has hit all time lows in Charles County lately.

    So as of right now we will be walking into a project that is supposed to provide some jobs 15 years from now; but WILL have us immediately in the hole $61 million at least ($44 million for the road, $17 million for water and sewer).

    WR&A prepared the study which recommended the means whereby the County would provide water and sewer to the park.


    A thorough review of the on site design of the water and sewer will be performed during the Preliminary Plan Stage.


    Whitman, Requardt, and Associates, LLP
    February, 2009, Page 7, Application for the Applicant.



    Rick Campbell

    formerly known on the ‘Duck’ as boozacbe

    Comment by Rick Campbell  on  10/15/09  at  06:38 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 12. · #8
    Not only the Bryans Road area, but the development along the CCC extension would obtain water from the aquifers too!!

    I believe the idea behind using the Chapman's wells was to allow the Lower Patapsco to rebound, but ironically, by using the Chapman's wells, it would encourage more "growth", which over time, would only exacerbate the water supply problem


    I need enlightening. HOW can the Commissioners even THINK about proceeding with a Tech Park, a CrossCountyConnector and the resultant housing both will bring WHEN there is NOT enough potable water to support even the citizens who live in the Western part of the County now?

    It seems freakin' unbelievable that this group of Commissioners are so narrow-sighted that they continue to advance their pet projects knowing full well they aren't feasible as they stand and a waste of money!

    Shouldn't the very FIRST consideration when dealing with new businesses or residential growth be guaranteeing a potable water supply?

    Comment by seahorse  on  10/16/09  at  09:36 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 13. ·
    I need enlightening. HOW can the Commissioners even THINK about proceeding with a Tech Park, a CrossCountyConnector and the resultant housing both will bring WHEN there is NOT enough potable water to support even the citizens who live in the Western part of the County now?


    oh, but haven't you heard the good news? King Cooper said the water/aquifer situation is improving.

    snork.

    Comment by xcitor  on  10/16/09  at  09:53 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 14. · Oh ye of little faith. Using the logic we've become used to, next week's press release will likely state that this weekend's N'oreaster has provided enough water for the aquifers to last through the end of the century.

    Comment by Ken Robinson  on  10/16/09  at  10:36 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 15. · Maryland HB 1141 was supposed to have taken effect on October 1st of this year.

    This requires that local governments consider the water supply before approving new subdivisions etc.

    Whether or not this law will have any "teeth" is yet to be determined, as many local governments think that development is more important than the water supply!

    One of the reasons (although there were other more important reasons) why I did not reapply for WRAC II was that I figure the Commissioners are gonna do as they please, unless the State MANDATES otherwise.

    I suppose the Commissioners were "banking" on the use of the Chapman's wells (located in the Patuxent aquifer, the last one before bedrock) for all the new development planned in Bryans Road, or connecting to WSSC.

    BTW, the Patuxent aquifer is starting to exhibit water table declines already as some areas of Bryans Road and Indian Head are already tapped into it.

    Not a very comforting scenario is it?

    Comment by cheryl  on  10/16/09  at  10:45 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 16. ·
    next week's press release will likely state that this weekend's N'oreaster has provided enough water for the aquifers to last through the end of the century.


    Yep! They know darn well that it takes years and sometimes DECADES for replenishment of the aquifers to occur, yet I suppose they think that most people don't even know what an aquifer is, let alone how long it takes to for rainwater to reach them.

    Because there's so much pavement and development in the region, much of that rainwater runs off into streams and eventually into the Potomac.

    THESE are the people that must be educated about the fragility of the aquifers.

    Comment by cheryl  on  10/16/09  at  10:55 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 17. · You need to see the commissioners meeting video oct-6th and you will understand it is about creation of wealth (economic developement) this video shows how out of touch cooper is and how the commissioners are pushed to make deception of what will help the County as they push to build build build. even the folks who came out in support of the tech park at the hearing exspressed to the commissioners that residential and retail developement cost us money in the long run. I guess they only herd what they wanted to from those folks. Seems like the more wealth they create the poorer we all get.
    Sadly by the time most figure out the purpose its to late to do anything. Bottom line we get screwed !

    Comment by amphibia  on  10/16/09  at  12:21 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 18. · 12 'How can the commissioners proceed with the Tech park CCC and associated housing growth when there is not enough portable water now for the citizens of west county""

    Let us hope that Annapolis knows what a bunch of ruthless profiteers we have at the helm of county govt-where 'quick development profits' for da buds take precedence of all else including many currentcitizens in western county's well being..

    let us hope Annapolis sonner rather than later realizes that this is a nefarious self interested bunch at the helm of CC govt..who when the real water crisis hits as predicted by the DNR will be building castles in the sand made of gold coins without a care at their waterfront villas far away from CCounty.

    Jason Groth is nothing more than a mouth piece for the commissioners script as he is sworn to silence of any real honest opinion that he may have and be willing to share....what a life for the CVC govt employyees -to surrender so much personal freedom and maybe some integrity in the battle os survival for the legal tender

    Comment by WaterWorks  on  10/16/09  at  05:05 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 19. · Hoping Mr. Ken Robinson gets elected and deals with the lack of potable water issue especially in West county in a responsible way and does not just kick the can down the road to impending disaster like the unthinking lazziez faire state of affairs now in county govt in regard to our dwindling resource.

    I have a question for you Ken in relation to your private business and county government matters regarding work for parties or parties associated with those parties doing ---or potentially wanting to do---business in the county.

    Will you allow yourself to do private PR/film work for fee as you did for WSG and then recuse yourself from vital county issues. I realize you were a back up on the govt board, and that you did work for WSG a year prior to- their formal- submission to the county.

    Still, As commissioner your recusal on issues because you have done work for certain parties will essentially make you another yes vote for the horribly mismanaged staus quo-then I would ask why should i give you my intended vote?

    Or, will you not do private work for these parties wanting to/currently doing business with the county while you are a commissioner so that you will have an unaffected vote on such important matters as development in the face on a dwindling finite aquifer system....??

    It would look really bad if you as commissioner did private work for potential parties or associates wishing to do future business in the county, and then explaining later with surprise that you had no way of knowing that they would be in the county meeting room.-

    How are you going to handle this situation that has already mildly bitten you in the butt once?? Inquiring minds want to know..

    Comment by WaterWorks  on  10/16/09  at  08:19 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 20. · Thanks for your kind words.

    I do take issue however with your claim that I was "bitten in the butt." As I stated a while ago, when I did work for WSG, they had no association with Charles County and I was not a member of the Board of Appeals. The combination of the two was beyond anything I could have possibly imagined. It would have been wrong of me not to state my past professional association with them. I did then and believe now that WSG should be a non-issue as it relates to me.

    To your question about doing work for either the county or anyone doing business with the county. It will not happen so there will be nothing for me to recuse myself from. WSG was a fluke from my regular business of mostly working for academic institutions. My relationship with WSG came from a project I had done in 2004 for the George Washington University and the Department of Homeland Security. Sean Miller was a consultant for the clients on that project which is how he found me a couple of years later.

    Because of my past non-professional activities related to Mirant's Morgantown Plant, I do think it would be the right thing for me to pass on if as commissioner I had to deal with that company. After all, I did create and host a website called stopmirant.com. I think it would be the ethical thing to do.

    Comment by Ken Robinson  on  10/16/09  at  10:01 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 21. · #17
    You need to see the commissioners meeting video oct-6th and you will understand it is about creation of wealth (economic developement)


    That term "creation of wealth" sounds like the words of a cheesebag spinner trying to keep his rice bowl filled.

    Comment by seahorse  on  10/17/09  at  08:07 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 22. · 20
    To date you continue to be the most transparent candidate in the local public arena-yet i noticed you skipped by a a mention of a plan/ideas [best laid plans of mice and men] which addresses specific local county action to abate our dwindling aquifer system - our critical water issue especially in West county in the face of future expected[i hope, slower smarter growth-not the current helter skelter approach of our current commissioners]..what are your thoughts or promises to the voters in regard to this critial very vulnerable resource.

    I appreciate your candidness related to your private work and your public ambitions. I hope you will be one of the few-it seems,these days-that keep the people, all the people the poorer among us and those seniors on fixed incomes in mind during the governance of CC. These foks have largely gotten the financial shaft from the current self annointed royalty -many forced to leave their home for decades as they leave the workforce in retirement and do not have the continuing means to live in a fiscally able and comfortable manner in the county.

    Regarding Mirant-i understand your want to recuse yourself from votes. But I would hope that would not mean you would be silent as a church mouse on Mirant issues which are potentially going to affect the quality of our environment and river, and pocket book for some time to come. I would hope even though you chos to recuse your self from formal official votes that you would continue to make your logical rational thought heard; regarding this foreign corporate giant which is going to be bringing slag from SA via waterway for use in conjunction with its new vapor smoke stacks instead of using a purer burning coal found domestically.

    IMHO- For you to remain totally silent on such a vital issue of such great concern to our health and environment, and pocketbook sole because you have been at the head of the spear of opposition with them before would seem to me to be of great recalcitrant cost to your critical guidance on such potentially critical future issues.

    Especially since your election will be bouyed by votes from your work and stance on such a critical environemntal issue.
    I would hate to see you throw the baby out with the bathwater thru silence on Mirant matters sole because you would now be on the county government payroll in an official capacity-for it is your very work and stands on these issues that will get you elected.

    To get elected for such good reasons, and then to totally avoid them after sitting on the board of commissioners kind of defeats the purpose of your election ???Dooes it not?

    Maybe you can help clarify how you would habndle matters of Miarant while you sit on the BOC? Surely, it wont be the Edith Patterson -quite as a church mouse approach to governane, lest she rock her very comfortable status quo-

    To what degree will you now manage/conform/sacrafice to silence your opinions as a community leader on issues which were passionate enough to you to fight about for the greater community before you were elected commissioner?????

    Inquiring minds want to know how you will handle this type of situation -keeping in mind that your foremost and greater loyalty is to the citizens who elected you and a responsible stewardship of an envrinment under serious attack...

    Comment by WaterWorks  on  10/17/09  at  11:24 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 23. · 22 correction- purer burning coal on its own presently is a bit of a an oxymoron

    Comment by WaterWorks  on  10/17/09  at  11:30 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 24. · I will not be quiet as it relates to Mirant or any other company that is ruining our environment. I will just do what is ethically the right thing to do.

    Regarding water, I will use what I have learned from the Mirant experience to the county's benefit.

    I would like to see the desal plant at Morgantown used as a template in other parts of the county (Indian Head and Bryans Road) that have close proximity to the Potomac for industrial and landscaping applications and perhaps down the road for drinking purposes too.

    I would also like to revisit the treated effluent option as a way to take the strain off of our aquifers. That opportunity disappeared two years ago.

    MDE will be changing the rules this month regarding how treated effluent can be used. If we can divert the sewage from La Plata that is now feeding into the Port Tobacco River for something positive, it would be the ultimate win-win situation for our environment and our water supply.

    Comment by Ken Robinson  on  10/17/09  at  12:51 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 25. · If your action keeps up with your astute rhetoric-and i have faith that you have garnered much education from seeing both sides of the arguement with your involvement in SP-though you started out as not a very typical friend of the environment in the SP process imho-
    -you thru hours of hearing both sides and realizing a comprmise and downsizing was neccessary -in the face of your own initial wants at SP have come to better understand and speak out and act on critical environmental issues-which once screwed up may take a generation to improve -if not destroyed forever ..some things we only get one shot at..

    Keep being as candid and open as you are on the Duck and open up the govt to transparency in CC-when the Cooper's/Hodges want to take everything behind closed doors for the bud loop-keep having the guts to come out and tell the public what is going on-after all it is our hard earned ever more tax burdens that allow the governance proceess to exist..

    So long as you stay true to your core rhetoric and past actions which indicate personal growth and action relative to citizen and environmental responsibility
    'YOU BE DA MAN'''To begin to take this county in a new direction thru the use of open transparency.....and the will to fight for it.

    Keep up the good fight Ken.

    Comment by WaterWorks  on  10/17/09  at  01:21 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 26. · number 11
    The Indian Head Science and Tech Park will cause Charles County to incur $1,537,934 per year in water and sewer charges to support the construction and service for this project.


    Why? Are we the developer of the Park or is it a Private Company? I must profess to not keeping up with this issue.

    Thank you Rick for uncovering that information and bringing it to the public who are not up to 'snuff' on all issues.

    formerly known on the ‘Duck’ as spirit of the elder & BJGoodwin

    Comment by Barbara  on  10/17/09  at  05:42 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • Page 1 of 1 pages

YOU MUST BE A REGISTERED MEMBER AND LOGGED-IN TO POST COMMENTS

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

<< Back to main

Copyright © 2003-2012, Delusional Duck®, All rights reserved. Delusional Duck® is a Registered Trademark.
Comment Policy | Terms of Use | .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Home | Discussion Forums