Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Register
-ADVERTISMENT-
Slideshow image
-ADVERTISMENT-
Anyone interested in ad space, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Search Delusional Duck Recent Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post comments.
On 05/22/12 at 10:43 PM:
Hydrilla added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 09:40 PM:
QuercusP added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 05:43 PM:
seahorse added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 04:21 PM:
xcitor added comments to the thread: U.S. Chamber of Commerce to spend big on 2012 election
On 05/22/12 at 03:30 PM:
seahorse added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 03:00 PM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 02:11 PM:
seahorse added comments to the thread: Charles County Planning Commission Meeting Video
On 05/22/12 at 09:01 AM:
xcitor added comments to the thread: Appeals court rejects ballot access petitions for Libertarians, Greens
On 05/22/12 at 06:17 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: STAFF REPORTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MAY 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 10:06 PM:
Iamangttia added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 06:04 PM:
MarylandRes added comments to the thread: Tax abuse
On 05/21/12 at 06:01 PM:
MarylandRes added comments to the thread: Tax abuse
On 05/21/12 at 11:26 AM:
Hydrilla added comments to the thread: Hoyer Statement on FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act
On 05/21/12 at 11:21 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Commissioner Approval Items
On 05/21/12 at 11:19 AM:
cheryl added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 11:17 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Commissioner Approval Items
On 05/21/12 at 11:12 AM:
Diane Edge, (AKA gizmo123) added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
On 05/21/12 at 11:12 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: St. Charles Kicks Off Summer Concert Series
On 05/21/12 at 11:09 AM:
Barbara added comments to the thread: Open Thread - May 21, 2012
On 05/21/12 at 08:21 AM:
franklin added comments to the thread: Maryland sees biggest job loss in nation in April
Recent Forum Posts
All registered members can start new threads and/or reply to existing ones on the Discussion Forums.
  • 12/21/2012
    last comment by: Viper
    01/26/2012 at 05:06 pm
Other Local Blogs
Ready, Willing and Abell

St. Charles Forums (ACPT)
Charles County Links Other Links Cable News Networks Local Media Newspapers Archives Blog Stats
Registered members: 637
Number of posts: 40133
Number of Comments: 46635
Last: 05/22/2012 10:43 pm
Guests online: 36


Members logged on:
Delusional Duck Feeds Credits
Powered by ExpressionEngine from EllisLab, Inc.
Hosting by EngineHosting

image

5042733

<<< Next Entry | Previous Entry >>>

Add your comments

This page has been viewed 147 times

Should Charles County Reduce the Minimum Home Size?

Last week the Charles County Commissioners held an open forum to discuss a proposal to reduce the minimum home size in Charles County from 1,650 square feet to 1,250 s.f..

I personally feel that the idea of reducing the minimum home size builders can construct is an excellent idea, and I was dismayed to see the article in the Maryland Independent that gave what was (in my opinion) a biased, narrow-minded viewpoint of the proposal.  I wanted to speak about some of the inaccuracies that the article printed as fact without any editorial verification.  Perhaps if people looked at this issue from a broader standpoint, this proposal would make a lot more sense.


Posted by: Sammy on 03/08/10 at 03:57 PM
    Page 1 of 1 pages
  • 1. · "Lowering the minimum home size WILL promote affordability in Charles County and it’s a great way to promote the “green city initiative” that ACPT has been talking about. Why wouldn’t we as a community want to reduce waste, reduce unnecessary expense, and reduce the communities carbon footprint?"

    I appreciate some of the points this writer brings out - and I agree with the main point, on affordability, and that a BUYER or Home Owner Builder - should be able to choose a smaller home - FOR SURE. And the Govt. has no business requiring a 1650 sq foot house - or "letting us" build a 1250 sq foot house!!

    Comment by creekworks  on  03/08/10  at  07:12 PM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
  • 2. · With aging baby boomers, the demand for smaller homes is already up - so why should the government get involved?

    Comment by cheryl  on  03/09/10  at  07:29 AM | [Back to Top] | [Back to Main]
    • Page 1 of 1 pages

YOU MUST BE A REGISTERED MEMBER AND LOGGED-IN TO POST COMMENTS

Smileys

 @ 
<a>

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Next entry: Montgomery County needs more affordable housing, officials say

Previous entry: Bill would force schools to address gang activity

<< Back to main

Copyright © 2003-2012, Delusional Duck®, All rights reserved. Delusional Duck® is a Registered Trademark.
Comment Policy | Terms of Use | .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Home | Discussion Forums